News

Letters to the editor: Move Air Canada’s headquarters out of Quebec


Article content

‘Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland succumbed to pure-laine fascism’

Re: English-speaking Air Canada CEO latest victim of Quebec fragility, Terence Corcoran, Nov. 9

Advertisement

Article content

Canadian law requires Air Canada to be functionally bilingual. It does not require that every employee of Air Canada be functionally bilingual, and with good reason. Indeed, Canada’s Constitution protects the right of all citizens to advance in society without being discriminated against based on their language.

Terence Corcoran is the first person to come out publicly in defence of CEO Michael Rousseau and defend Canada’s Constitution. Quebec Premier François Legault, journalist Chantal Hébert, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland all have succumbed to pure-laine fascism. So has Michael Rousseau, whose apology strikes a blow against the right of all Canadians to advance in society no matter which official language they happen to speak. Corcoran’s rejoinder “Mange la merde” is an entirely appropriate insult to throw at unilingual bullies in a school yard. When, however, the bullies are leading politicians who believe that only fully bilingual Canadians are worthy of promotion, “Mange la s–t” seems much more à propos.

Advertisement

Article content

Patrick Cowan, Toronto


Perhaps it’s time for an MP to introduce a bill in the House of Commons eliminating the need for the headquarters of a national airline to stay in Montréal. If Air Canada could legally move its head office from the province of Québec, it would be free to hire and promote staff on their merits, depending on what is best for the airline, rather than what is best for Québec.

That would certainly solve the problem identified by the prime minister and the deputy prime minister and they would no longer have a need to lecture a private company on how to run its business.

Patrick Hunt, Victoria, B.C.

‘Appalled by decision of Toronto District School Board’

Re: Shameful that Toronto school board opposed Marie Henein event, Kathryn Marshall, Nov. 15

Advertisement

Article content

Like Kathryn Marshall, I was appalled, but not surprised, by the decision of the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) to not promote Marie Henein’s book and appearance at the book club for teenage girls, and then dance around the decision when queried by Marshall.

It should be patently obvious that TDSB has a sliding scale of values. It had no problem negating Henein, who, as pointed out by Marshall, is considered by many to be the top criminal defence lawyer in the country, because it disapproved of her successful defence of Jian Ghomeshi. But it is reluctant to deal with the likes of author Desmond Cole, who used a platform accorded him by TDSB to launch an anti-Israel rant, and more recently students at Marc Garneau Collegiate Institute who staged an anti-Israel walkout, all of which has devolved into anti-Semitism, calls for the annihilation of Israel, and generally rendering the TDSB and its schools an unsafe and hostile environment for Jewish teachers and students.

Advertisement

Article content

If I were a parent, I would be thinking long and hard about whether to enrol my child in a TDSB school. Private schools are looking increasingly like the better option.

E. Joan O’Callaghan, Toronto

Who’s fighting inflation for everyday Canadians?

Re: The country needs an opposition. Too bad O’Toole’s Conservatives seem too gutless to provide it, Rex Murphy, Nov. 10; and With Parliament set to return, Pierre Poilievre sinks his teeth into inflation, Brian Platt, Nov. 15

While I have no doubt inflation is an important issue to Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives, their conspicuous silence on huge upcoming dairy price increases — 8.4 per cent for milk and 12.4 per cent for butter — approved by a quasi-government-supported dairy board, seriously undermines their credentials on this matter. There’s been not a question asked about the board not presenting backing information on costs to support the increases. Maybe they are justified increases, who knows. But if the Conservatives can’t even be concerned by record rising costs for such basic staples as milk, butter and cheese, how can they say they’re fighting for everyday Canadians on the inflation issue?

Advertisement

Article content

Robert Vogel, Toronto


What is the point of a “shadow cabinet?” Shadows need to be attached to warriors. And warriors need a strong, fearless, motivating leader. The Conservative Party of Canada will never have more battles to fight than now and there is no time to waste. The CPC may have identified such a leader with the return of Pierre Poilievre as financial critic. Canada is worth fighting for.

R.G. (Rick) MacPhee, Surrey, B.C.

Climate change battle ‘hard enough without demoralizing diatribes’

Re: Climate change programs are rife with corruption — the clowns are running the circus, Sabrina Maddeaux, Nov. 13

Advertisement

Article content

World War II had Tokyo Rose and the Vietnam War had Hanoi Hannah to discourage the troops with disheartening words that made them question why they were fighting for a futile cause. Today, those battling against climate change must also fight against the negativity of those who maintain that efforts to limit and sustain the impacts of climate change are doomed to failure because all the money goes to kleptocrats and their corporate cronies. This battle is hard enough without such demoralizing diatribes.

Liz Addison, Toronto

Carrie Bourassa and questions of identity

Re: Carrie Bourassa’s evolving Indigenous identity a years-long con, Colby Cosh, Nov. 12

If a man can “be” a woman because he identifies as a woman, why can’t Carrie Bourassa “be” Aboriginal because she feels she is? And if, as Cosh writes, “Indigenous folk have been labouring to explain in the press what was wrong with her concoction,” and if we heed their complaints, why would we not heed the complaints of female athletes forced to compete against men who feel that they are women?

How is the alchemy of one different from the alchemy of the other?

Mendl Malkin, Toronto


The National Post welcomes letters to the editor (preferably 150 words or fewer). Letters should be emailed to [email protected] Please include your name, place of residence (town or city and province) and daytime phone number. Letters may be edited for length or clarity.

The big issues are far from settled. Sign up for the NP Comment newsletter, NP Platformed.

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *